Pfm Air, Inc. v. Dr. Ing. Hc. F. Porsche Ag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “there is no question of law” as the question of personal jurisdiction requires “a highly intensive evaluation of the facts”
• finding alter ego or agency relationship where subsidiary existed to provide support to parent in the forum country
• finding imputation appropriate when, among other things, the parent paid the salaries of the subsidiary’s employees and the parent “controlled the warranty program” that issued in the subsidiary’s name

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).