Pfeuffer v. Sculco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]ithout reasonable foreseeability — a hallmark of proximate cause — there exists no genuine issue of material fact as to . . . causation.”
• “[W]ithout 6 reasonable foreseeability — a hallmark of proximate cause — there exists no genuine issue of material fact as to . . . causation.”
• “Inextricably entwined with concepts of negligence and proximate cause is a notion of foreseeability, the idea that a defendant could reasonably foresee that an injury would result from his act or omission.” (citations omitted)
• “Inextricably entwined with concepts of negligence and proximate cause is a notion of foreseeability, the idea that a defendant could reasonably foresee that an injury would result from his act or omission.” (citations omitted)
• “Inextricably entwined with concepts of negligence and proximate cause is a notion of foreseeability, the idea that a defendant could reasonably foresee that an injury would result from his act or omission.” (citations omitted)
• “Inextricably entwined with concepts of negligence and proximate cause is a notion of foreseeability, the idea that a defendant could reasonably foresee that an injury would result from his act or omission.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).