· 9/26/1983
Pfeil v. Pfeil
Citations
- 115 Wis. 2d 502
- 341 N.W.2d 699
- 1983 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3959
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that VA benefits “lost their exemption when invested in [a] real estate purchase” and a mortgage note
- holding that a mortgage note and real property purchased with funds obtained through disability benefits were subject to division
- veterans’ disability benefits lost exempt status when “invested in [a] mortgage note” and “real estate purchase[s]”
- under the predecessor to 38 USC § 5301, VA disability benefits “are not to be divided between 6 spouses in a divorce action and not to be made the basis for an offsetting or compensatory award to the spouse of the disabled veteran receiving the service- connected disability award”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scott, Voss, Hansen, Reserve
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.