Skip to main content
· 9/26/1983

Pfeil v. Pfeil

Citations

  • 115 Wis. 2d 502
  • 341 N.W.2d 699
  • 1983 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3959

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that VA benefits “lost their exemption when invested in [a] real estate purchase” and a mortgage note
  • holding that a mortgage note and real property purchased with funds obtained through disability benefits were subject to division
  • veterans’ disability benefits lost exempt status when “invested in [a] mortgage note” and “real estate purchase[s]”
  • under the predecessor to 38 USC § 5301, VA disability benefits “are not to be divided between 6 spouses in a divorce action and not to be made the basis for an offsetting or compensatory award to the spouse of the disabled veteran receiving the service- connected disability award”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott, Voss, Hansen, Reserve

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.