Pfeiffer v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting district court did not err in finding that two significant correlations between exam and job performance components did not make \'convincing' evidence of job relatedness\ (citation omitted)
• \[C]ivil service tests were instituted to replace the evils of a subjective hiring process . . . .\
• affirming a finding of invalidity as “supported by the record”
• affirming a finding of invalidity as \supported by the record\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).