· 1/29/1985
P.F. Cosmetique, S.A. v. Minnetonka Inc.
Citations
- 605 F. Supp. 662
- 226 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 86
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying dilution claim to the trade dress packaging of beauty aids
- presentation of sales and advertising figures insufficient by itself to establish secondary meaning for trade dress
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leisure
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.