Skip to main content
· 1/29/1985

P.F. Cosmetique, S.A. v. Minnetonka Inc.

Citations

  • 605 F. Supp. 662
  • 226 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 86

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying dilution claim to the trade dress packaging of beauty aids
  • presentation of sales and advertising figures insufficient by itself to establish secondary meaning for trade dress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leisure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.