Pezuela v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “‘course of conduct’ and ‘bent of mind’ are not among the purposes for introducing similar transaction evidence under the new Georgia Evidence Code.”
• noting that “ ‘course of conduct’ and ‘bent of mind’ are not listed among the purposes for introducing similar transaction evidence under the new Georgia Evidence Code”
• finding it highly unlikely that the admission of the sentencing order for the defendant’s prior convictions contributed to the jury’s guilty verdict
• use of evidence of prior crime that is otherwise admissible precluded if State attempting to relitigate facts resolved in defendant’s favor in prior trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).