Peyton v. Horner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing an award of attorney’s fees under a post-1999 version of the statute where the losing party advanced a plausible interpretation of an assignment that the trial court determined to be incorrect
• reversing judgment awarding section 57.105 fees where “[t]he issue was not so cut and-dried that either the association or its attorney knew or should have known that it was not supported by the material facts necessary to establish standing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).