Peyton v. Fred's Stores of Arkansas, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employee who was unable to work and could not tell employer when she would return to work was not a qualified individual at the time of her termination
• “a person who cannot perform any of the functions of the job, with or without a reasonable accommodation, cannot, as a matter of law, be considered ‘otherwise qualified’ under the ADA”
• “it is axiomatic that a person who cannot perform any of the functions of a job, with or without reasonable accommodation, cannot, as a matter of law, be considered ‘otherwise qualified’ under the ADA.”
• “it is axiomatic that a person who cannot perform any of the functions of a job, with or without reasonable accommodation, cannot, as a matter of law, be considered ‘otherwise qualified’ under the ADA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).