Pexa v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the above standard in a case involving animals in a fenced lot, specifically mentioning the “busy highway” adjacent to the enclosure
• adopting the above standard in a case involving animals in a fenced lot, specifically mentioning the \busy highway\ adjacent to the enclosure
• declining the invitation to overrule Hanisch and remanding for trial on all issues
• granting a new trial to plaintiff on both causes of action because the jury’s award of damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering, but not wrongful death, was inconsistent and reflected a compromise
• noting proximity of animals to road as a factor to be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).