· 8/28/1984
Petz v. Estate of Petz
Citations
- 467 N.E.2d 780
- 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 712
- 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 2953
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because the security interest involved both real and personal property it was governed by the real property law and Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code was inapplicable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Staton, Hoffman, Neal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.