Skip to main content
· 8/28/1984

Petz v. Estate of Petz

Citations

  • 467 N.E.2d 780
  • 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 712
  • 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 2953

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the security interest involved both real and personal property it was governed by the real property law and Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code was inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Hoffman, Neal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.