Skip to main content
· 1/16/1987

Pettus v. Keeling

Citations

  • 352 S.E.2d 321
  • 232 Va. 483
  • 3 Va. Law Rep. 1668
  • 1987 Va. LEXIS 158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in the circumstances, that “lack of daily, weekly, or even monthly use for the required period of time did not ... interrupt continuity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.