Petto v. the Raymond Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court’s directed verdict where plaintiff had failed to introduce evidence of frequency or foreseeability of accidents and failed to provide evidence regarding the suitability of alternative designs
• plaintiff failed to state prima facie case partly due to lack of evidence concerning frequency of accidents such as his
• plaintiff failed to state prima facie case partly due to lack of evidence concerning frequency of accidents such as his

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reeves v. Cincinnati, Inc
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-04-03· cited 51×
• Fisher v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  E.D. Michigan· 1994-02-02· cited 15×
• Gawenda v. Werner Co.
  E.D. Michigan· 1996-05-23· cited 5×
• Westphal v. American Honda Motor Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1990-07-18· cited 3×
• Zettle v. Handy Manufacturing Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 1993-07-07· cited 3×
• Zettle v. Handy Manufacturing Company
  Sixth Circuit· 1993-07-07

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1982-11-23· cited 156×
• Bouwman v. Chrysler Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-04-05· cited 36×
• Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Walter Kidde & Co., Inc.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-10-07· cited 20×
• VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF AZ. v. Kline
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-07-28· cited 13×
• In Re Deeren
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-03-16· cited 2×