Pettit v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not appealable because “it lacks the finality of an order entering judgment in favor of a party and against the party opponent”
• recognizing that an order denying summary judgment is not a final order
• dismissing appeal of an order that granted summary judgment, \as it lacks the finality of an order entering judgment in favor of a party and against the party opponent\ (citing Moore Int'l Trucks, Inc. v. Foothill Capital Corp., 560 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990))
• \The order that grants a motion for summary judgment . . . lacks the finality of an order entering judgment in favor of a party and against the party opponent.\ (citing Moore Int'l Trucks, Inc. v. Foothill Cap. Corp., 560 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).