Skip to main content
· 4/10/1996

Pettinato v. Johnson

Citations

  • 674 So. 2d 148
  • 1996 WL 164634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • receding from three opinions because of inconsistency with later supreme court holding
  • three-judge panel recognizing that a supreme court opinion in a case decided subsequent to district court decisions required the district court panel to “recede from the following three opinions of this court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.