Pettinato v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• receding from three opinions because of inconsistency with later supreme court holding
• three-judge panel recognizing that a supreme court opinion in a case decided subsequent to district court decisions required the district court panel to “recede from the following three opinions of this court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wood v. Fraser
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-14· cited 33×
• Steckler v. Steckler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-17· cited 18×
• Kessler v. Kessler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-22· cited 2×
• Meixner v. Meixner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-25· cited 1×
• Scott v. White
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-12

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Yurgel v. Yurgel
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-01· cited 65×
• Matteson v. Matteson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-02-01· cited 19×
• Lamon v. Rewis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-28· cited 18×
• Sperry v. Sperry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-02· cited 5×
• Osterink v. Mabrey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-15· cited 2×