· 4/10/1996
Pettinato v. Johnson
Citations
- 674 So. 2d 148
- 1996 WL 164634
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- receding from three opinions because of inconsistency with later supreme court holding
- three-judge panel recognizing that a supreme court opinion in a case decided subsequent to district court decisions required the district court panel to “recede from the following three opinions of this court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.