Pettengill v. Curtis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that negligent supervision is an omission rather than an affirmative act
• stating that Section 3(d) would “only apply if general jurisdiction existed over the Individual Defendants”
• noting that “§ 3(d) would only apply if general jurisdiction existed over the Individual Defendants”
• finding that negligent promotion can be the “original cause” of a plaintiff’s injury-causing situation
• refusing to dismiss claims against city for negligent promotion of employee who sexually assaulted plaintiff where city knew or should have known employee was abusing children prior'to promotion
• “The discovery rule also applies to the presentment period because it counts from when a cause of action arose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).