Petry v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff sufficiently plead a claim for civil conspiracy by alleging a detailed scheme under which defendants violated the Maryland Finder’s Fee Act
• declining to extend aiding and abetting liability under the Finder’s Fee Act and the Maryland Consumer Protection Act
• “Once a claim has been stated adequately . . . it may be supported by showing any set of facts consistent with the allegations in the complaint.”
• “Once a claim has been stated adequately . . . it may be supported by showing any set of facts consistent with the allegations in the complaint.”
• “Once a claim has been stated adequately . . . it may be supported by showing any set of facts consistent with the allegations in the complaint.”
• “Once a claim has been stated adequately . . . it may be supported by showing any set of facts consistent with the allegations in the complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).