Supreme Court of Arkansas· 12/11/1997

Petrus v. Nature Conservancy

Citations

957 S.W.2d 688
330 Ark. 722
1997 Ark. LEXIS 698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the requirement that a court order fix and describe the boundary lines in a dispute between landowners discourages piecemeal litigation
noting that the requirement that a court order fix and describe the boundary lines in a dispute between landowners discourages piecemeal litigation
dismissing appeal for lack of finality where the chancellor’s order failed to identify the boundaries of the property in dispute where the parties intended to rely upon a future survey to establish the property boundary
dismissing appeal for lack of finality where the chancellor's order failed to identify the boundaries of the property in dispute where the parties intended to rely upon a future survey to establish the property boundary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze, Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.