Skip to main content
· 12/11/1997

Petrus v. Nature Conservancy

Citations

  • 957 S.W.2d 688
  • 330 Ark. 722
  • 1997 Ark. LEXIS 698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the requirement that a court order fix and describe the boundary lines in a dispute between landowners discourages piecemeal litigation
  • noting that the requirement that a court order fix and describe the boundary lines in a dispute between landowners discourages piecemeal litigation
  • dismissing appeal for lack of finality where the chancellor’s order failed to identify the boundaries of the property in dispute where the parties intended to rely upon a future survey to establish the property boundary
  • dismissing appeal for lack of finality where the chancellor's order failed to identify the boundaries of the property in dispute where the parties intended to rely upon a future survey to establish the property boundary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze, Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.