Petrovic v. Hyde

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases and noting that “evidence-free” arguments against benefit fund calculations are insufficient to raise a question of fact
• granting summary judgment on the 31 issue of damages, reasoning that defendants could not “avoid summary judgment by speculating— without evidence—that the Fund may have made a miscalculation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).