Petroskey v. Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no violation of Minnesota Whistleblower Act where employee’s report of law firm partner’s sexually abusive tirade of female paralegal, while reprehensible, did not invoke whistleblower protection
• plaintiff must have more than “a conjectural belief that a violation of law had occurred” under subdivision 1(c)
• “The mere fact that, theoretically, an employer may contemplate action which, if consummated, could be contrary to public policy is insufficient, under the governing law, to invoke the protections of the Whis-tleblower Statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).