PETROL, LTD. v. Radulovic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a duty of disclosure exists where there is a fiduciary or other relationship of trust and confidence between plaintiff and defendant (quoting State v. Mark Marks, P.A., 654 So. 2d 1184, 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995))
• stating that “[a] defendant’s knowing concealment or non-disclosure of a material fact may only support an action for fraud where there is a duty to disclose”
• stating that “[a] defendant’s knowing concealment or non-disclosure of a material fact may only support an action for fraud where there is a duty to disclose”
• stating that a duty to disclose “arises when one party has information that the other party has a right to know because of a fiduciary or other relation of trust or confidence between them” (quotation marks omitted)
• “A defendant’s knowing concealment or non-disclosure of a material fact may only support an action for fraud where there is a duty to disclose”
• “A defendant’s knowing concealment or non-disclosure of a material fact may only support an action for fraud where there is a duty to disclose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).