Petricca Construction Co. v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when the meamng of an instrument is not plain or becomes doubtful in its application to a particular transaction, extraneous evidence is admissible to explain the significance of terms used

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Eye Associates, P.C. v. Incomrx Systems Limited Partnership
  Second Circuit· 1990-08-15· cited 59×
• C & M CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-12-12· cited 24×
• In Re Simon
  D. Massachusetts· 1995-03-16· cited 15×
• Katz v. Belko
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1983-06-20· cited 5×
• Crespo v. Cynosure, Inc.
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2008-12-12

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Perkins School for the Blind v. Rate Setting Commission
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-06-30· cited 67×
• Chas. T. Main, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1964-03-04· cited 17×
• Levin v. Century Indemnity Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1932-05-19· cited 15×