Petrella v. Leisky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the label “[s]upplemental [c]ounts” was “not correct because supplemental pleadings are employed to set forth matters arising after the original pleading has been filed”
• noting that the label “[s]upplemental [c]ounts” was “not correct because supplemental pleadings are employed to set forth matters arising after the original pleading has been filed”
• merely states the rule was to be “found in Illinois case law”
• merely states the rule was to be “found in Illinois case law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).