Petrain v. Kiernan
Citations
- 23 Or. 455
- 32 P. 158
- 1893 Ore. LEXIS 45
Syllabus
<p>Possession of Property — Notice to Purchaser. — The effect of the possession of real property is to excite inquiry in reference to the title. Even where the record title is perfect, a knowledge of extraneous facts sufficient to put a purchaser on inquiry, will charge him with all the knowledge that he might have obtained by a reasonable investigation.</p> <p>Purchaser prom Holder of Legal Title — Trust. — Where a cestue que trust is in possession of real estate the legal title to which is in another, a purchase from the latter takes it charged with notice of the trust.</p> <p>Trust — Notice —Evidence.—In a suit to enjoin an action at law for the recovery of a certain lot, and to establish a trust in favor of plaintiff, there was evidence that with money left by plaintiff’s deceased mother in a bank, in the name of plaintiff’s sister, their father purchased, in the latter’s name, a certain lot; that this lot was exchanged by the father for four lots, to one of which he retained title; that he afterwards conveyed such lot to a contractor to pay for a dwelling on one of the other three (the lot in dispute); that plaintiff had occupied the lot ever since the house was erected, several years prior to bringing this suit; that it was the understanding of the father and plaintiff from the statements of the sister that plaintiff was to have the property in dispute as her share in the division of the money left by their mother; and that defendants obtained title since the occupancy by plaintiff by mesne conveyances from the sister. Held, that a decree for plaintiff was proper.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- possession by cestui que trust notice to grantee from legal owner
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lord
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cooper v. ThomasonOregon Supreme Court· 1896-06-15· cited 33×
- Anderson v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court· 1921-06-08· cited 30×
- Ambrose v. HuntingtonOregon Supreme Court· 1899-03-27· cited 25×
- Alliance Trust Co. v. O'BrienOregon Supreme Court· 1897-11-08· cited 20×
- Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1924-07-01· cited 16×
- Methonen v. StoneAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-07-18· cited 14×
- Exon v. DanckeOregon Supreme Court· 1893-04-27· cited 14×
- Randall v. LingwallOregon Supreme Court· 1903-07-20· cited 14×
- McDougal v. LameOregon Supreme Court· 1901-05-04· cited 11×
- Chaffin v. SolomonOregon Supreme Court· 1970-02-11· cited 9×
- Webb v. StewartOregon Supreme Court· 1970-05-13· cited 9×
- Roy & Titcomb, Inc. v. VillaArizona Supreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 8×
- Gottstein v. KraftAlaska Supreme Court· 2012-04-13· cited 4×
- Hawley v. HawleyOregon Supreme Court· 1903-07-13· cited 3×
- Tort Committee v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in OregonD. Oregon· 2005-12-30
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.