Petraglia v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Anderson applicable to equal protection-based challenges to ballot access laws
• permitting, without discussing standing, minority-party candidate for President to challenge ballot access statute, which allegedly caused candidate \to shoulder an undue burden on . . . finances in order to gain a place on the ballot\
• “In [the Eleventh] Circuit ... equal protection challenges to state ballot-access ' laws are considered under the Anderson test.”
• \It is not entirely clear ... whether the Supreme Court would apply [the Anderson test] in an equal protection situation. None of the Supreme Court cases employing the Anderson test concerned an equal protection challenge to state election laws.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).