Petovello v. Murray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a contract is ambiguous if the language is susceptible to two or more reasonable interpretations.
• holding that a contract is ambiguous if the language is susceptible to two or more reasonable interpretations.
• “It is a fundamental principle of law that, if the language of a written contract is subject to two or more reasonable interpretations or is inconsistent on its face, the contract is ambiguous, and a factual development is necessary to determine the intent of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).