Skip to main content
· 6/10/1964

Federal Case

Citations

  • 332 F.2d 1006
  • 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “To the extent that there are elements of future losses which are represented in the final damages prejudgment interest is, of course, not appropriate.”
  • “[t]o the extent that there are elements of future losses which are represented in the final damages prejudgment interest is, of course, not appropriate”
  • “To the extent that there are elements of future losses which are represented in the final damages prejudgment interest is, of course, not appropriate.”
  • no prejudgment interest allowable to the extent that damages include future losses
  • no prejudgment interest allowable to the extent that damages include future losses
  • \It has long been held proper for admiralty courts fully to restore the injured party to [its] condition at the time of injury by allowing and fixing prejudgment interest from the date of the loss in proceedings involving property damage.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.