Petition of Schidlmeier by Koslof

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting 28 Pa. Code § 1.7(b) and concluding that legislative “policy embodied in Section 1.7(b
• held tradition and custom favoring paternal . -·-----··-----------~==~-~===~--- surnames does not constitute a valid reason for changh{ga-child'; name
• father’s allegation that name change was in child’s best interest did not meet burden of proof and trial court’s rationale that tradition and custom supported name change was not (Footnote Continued
• father’s allegation that name change was in child’s best interest did not meet burden of proof and trial court’s rationale that tradition and custom supported name change was not legally sufficient to sustain conclusion that name change was in child’s best interests
• father’s allegation that name change was in child’s best interest did not meet burden of proof and trial court’s rationale that tradition and custom supported name change was not legally sufficient to sustain conclusion that name change was in child’s best interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).