Skip to main content
· 1/26/1926

Petition of Andrew Dutton Co.

Citations

  • 10 F.2d 502
  • 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating a jury’s special verdict must necessarily resolve an issue in the defendant’s favor before collateral estoppel can apply.
  • jury silence on some, but not all, predicate acts for a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) offense did not bar retrial on those predicates
  • “A jury’s failure to decide an issue will be treated as an implied acquittal only where the jury’s verdict necessarily resolves an issue in the defendant’s favor.”
  • “If Swami had wanted the original jury to decide the Rule 31(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Bingham, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.