Petition 6470-R of Jensen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, because of ORS 109.831, we consider caselaw from other states when construing UCCJEA provisions
• concluding that juvenile court’s jurisdiction did not terminate when juvenile turned 18 based on long-standing Oregon law
• when juvenile court made certain factual findings that established dependency jurisdiction as a matter of law, the court erred by dismissing the dependency petition
• we consider other states’ interpretations of UCCJEA language in construing UCCJEA provisions
• \juvenile court's exclusive jurisdiction over a dependency case involving a person who is under 18 years of age attaches at the initiation of proceedings and is not thereafter lost merely because the child turns 18 years old before a wardship is established\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).