Petition 6426-R of Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the additional fact that the driver of the stolen vehicle could not produce the vehicle’s registration or insurance information established probable cause
• holding that the additional fact that the driver of the stolen vehicle could not produce the vehicle’s registration or insurance information established probable cause
• noting that the person using the vehicle “must know that he or she does not have the owner’s con- sent” to do so
• stating, in a case where the defendant argued that police did not have probable cause to arrest for UUV, that, under ORS 164.135(1), the defendant “must know that he or she does not have the owner’s consent”
• under ORS 164.135, the person using the vehicle “must know that he or she does not have the owner’s consent” to do so
• con- cluding that the driver’s inability to produce registration or insurance for the vehicle was the additional conduct on which “the police could reasonably rely” to establish prob- able cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).