Petition 6227-R of Stern Hat Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the order was not based on substantial reason because the board failed to connect its factual findings to its conclusion
• holding that the order was not based on substantial reason when the board failed to show how “the facts that it identifies connect to its conclusion”
• holding that an order was not based on substantial reason when the board failed to show how “the facts that it identifies connect to its conclusion”
• explaining that the \substantial reason requirement inheres in our substantial evidence standard of review under ORS 183.482(8)(c)\
• explaining that an insurer’s delay in payment is not unreasonable if, in view of the information available to the insurer, the insurer had a legitimate doubt about its liability
• the “substantial reason requirement inheres in our substantial evidence standard of review under ORS 183.482(8)(c)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).