Petition 5827-R of Chow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that organization was injured by having to divert resources where “no one’s concrete interests [were] invaded, [and thus] there [was] no initial injury to counter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).