Peterson v. Weissbein
Citations
- 80 Cal. 38
- 22 P. 56
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 852
Syllabus
<p>Ejectment — Constable’s Sale—Judgment—Bes Adjoticata—Estoppel in Favor of Privy—Evidence. — When in an action of ejectment defendants offer in evidence a jnstice’s judgment and execution in support of a constable’s deed under which they claim title, and also a judgment of the superior court in a prior action between the plaintiff and the defendant’s grantor adjudging that the judgment of the justice’s court and the sale under it were valid, such adjudication is competent and conclusive evidence in favor of the defendants, and precludes objection ,to.the validity of the justice’s judgment and execution.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A trial court can only consider admissible evidence in ruling on a motion for 24 summary judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Works
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Peterson v. Weissbein
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.