Peterson v. United Railways Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the question is not whether the words spoken by the defendant were false and malicious, but were they spoken in a judicial proceeding, and were they relevant and. pertinent to the subject of inquiry in that proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).