Peterson v. State
Citations
- 41 Fla. 285
Syllabus
<p>1. Where an indictment charges an assault with a named weapon, without designating the manner of its use, it. is the proper function of evidence to supply the particulars by pointing out the specific manner in which the weapon was used to accomplish the alleged assault.</p> <p>2. Where an indictment charges that an assault was committed with a pistol, but does not state the manner in which it was used, nor that it was loaded, nor that defendant discharged or attempted' to discharge it, evidence tending to show that the pistol was loaded and that the assault- was committed by discharging it at the person assaulted, is properly admissible.</p> <p>3. Evidence examined and found sufficient to support the verdict.</p>
Judges: Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 19×
- Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1902-01-15· cited 18×
- Pyke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 18×
- Lindsey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-02-11· cited 17×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-07-08· cited 7×
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-10-18· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. RaherMichigan Supreme Court· 1892-06-10· cited 25×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1874-11-15· cited 24×
- Dunaway v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1884-06-13· cited 18×
- Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1856-12-08· cited 17×
- State v. CroftTexas Supreme Court· 1855-07-01· cited 11×
- Mayfield v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1875-07-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.