Peterson v. St. Cloud Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding physician-patient relationship depends on whether care was contracted for with express or implied consent of patient for patient’s benefit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dougherty v. Gifford
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-02-25· cited 81×
• Weiss v. Rojanasathit
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1998-08-25· cited 53×
• Haberle v. Buchwald
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-01-28· cited 38×
• Kelley v. Middle Tennessee Emergency Physicians, P.C.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2004-04-23· cited 32×
• Schrader v. Kohout
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-07-15· cited 17×
• Zagaros v. Erickson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-02-04· cited 16×
• Molloy v. Meier
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-05-06· cited 9×
• Warren v. Dinter
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-04-17· cited 8×
• Canfield v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-05-23

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & Clinics
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-07-22· cited 379×
• Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-06-25· cited 94×
• Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-04-19· cited 92×
• Walters v. Rinker
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1988-03-29· cited 43×
• Geraldine Goellner v. Julius Butler, M.D., University of Minnesota
  Eighth Circuit· 1988-02-17· cited 26×
• Willette v. the Mayo Foundation
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-07-03· cited 2×