Skip to main content
· 12/29/1987

Peterson v. Skutt Ceramic Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 417 N.W.2d 648
  • 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 5141
  • 1987 WL 25444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because the . . . test is generally applied in the context of a default judgment, it is phrased in terms of whether a party has a meritorious defense. However, this may also be phrased in terms of whether the plaintiff has a meritorious claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.