Peterson v. Philadelphia Stock Exchange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no legislative intent from the statute or its legislative history to imply a private cause of action under 18 U.S.C. § 1951
• \The ordinary resort to legal process does not rise to the level of a 'wrongful use' of force or fear\ under Hobbs Act
• “The ordinary resort to legal process does not rise to the level of a ‘wrongful use’ of force or fear” under Hobbs Act
• no private action under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951
• “Since a plaintiff must confer a benefit on the defendant to support an unjust enrichment claim, this element has been interpreted by New Jersey courts as a requirement that ‘the plaintiff allege a sufficiently direct relationship with the defendant to support the claim.’”
• no private action under the Hobbs Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).