Peterson v. Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘[0]nce the ... case was decided on appeal, the circuit court was bound by the decree as the law of the case and was required to perform the purely ministerial act of implementing the mandate.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Matajek v. Skowronska
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-31· cited 24×
• Robinson v. Weiland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-11· cited 5×
• Jain v. Jain
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-30· cited 3×
• AON Trade Credit, Inc. v. QUINTEC, SA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-13· cited 1×
• Peterson v. Peterson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-19· cited 1×
• Shinitzky v. Shinitzky
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-17· cited 1×
• Donoff v. Donoff
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-04

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ondrejack v. Ondrejack
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-12· cited 66×
• Segall v. Segall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-25· cited 50×
• Kennedy v. Kennedy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-23· cited 43×
• Hill v. Palm Beach Polo, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-19· cited 11×
• Akins v. Akins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-14· cited 10×
• Peterson v. Peterson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-12· cited 3×
• A.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-22· cited 1×