Peterson v. MORTON F. PLANT HOSP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding settlement not yet reduced to writing but where settling defendant remained only nominal defendant and played no role in trial was not Mary Carter agreement that must be disclosed to jury
• remanding for a new trial because the trial court permitted details of a settlement agreement with a codefendant to become a feature of the trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).