Peterson v. Holiday Recreational Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the issue of venue was not properly before this court because appellants did not petition for mandamus following the district court’s venue ruling
• refusing to address post-trial appellate challenge to denial of change- of-venue request because “we will not stray from the long-accepted practice of addressing venue challenges via a petition for mandamus prior to trial”
• “The [unclean hands doctrine] does not apply where the relief sought by the plaintiff and the equitable right claimed by the defendant belong to or grow out of two entirely separate and distinct matters or transactions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).