Peterson v. Hohm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that unlike the Federal Rules, South Dakota requires that a defendant be served with a copy of the summons to commence an action
• noting that unlike the Federal Rules, South Dakota requires that a defendant be served with a copy of the summons to commence an action
• observing that South Dakota has not adopted savings statute for situations when plaintiff filed prior suit in another jurisdiction that was dismissed for lack for jurisdiction and declining to judicially create such rule or to apply equitable tolling
• “Persisting in a jurisdictional posture while waiting for a federal court to make an inevitable ruling is unreasonable when the limitations statute is poised to terminate the lawsuit.” (quoting Braaten v. Deere & Co., 569 N.W.2d 563, 566 (N.D. 1997))
• examining conduct in two North Dakota cases
• examining conduct in two North Dakota cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).