Peterson v. Henning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• objection to deponent’s expression of an opinion about the veracity of plaintiffs prior statement to her was not waived, because “[t]he defect of [the witness] interjecting her opinion could not have been ‘corrected’ at the time her deposition was taken”
• objection to deponent's expression of an opinion about the veracity of plaintiff's prior statement to her was not waived, because \[t]he defect of [the witness] interjecting her opinion could not have been `corrected' at the time her deposition was taken\
• objection to deponent's expression of an opinion about the veracity of plaintiff's prior statement to her was not waived, because \[t]he defect of [the witness] interjecting her opinion could not have been 'corrected' at the time her deposition was taken\
• “A defendant’s flight from the scene of the accident can be interpreted as an admission of his negligence for if he were ‘guilt free’ it is reasonable to assume he would stop to ascertain the nature of the accident or the extent of the victim’s injuries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).