Peterson v. Garnsey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant had property interest in vehicle sufficient to challenge GPS installation, but lacked standing to challenge use of device when vehicle was out of his possession
• de- fendant’s life sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to dis- tribute cocaine base was reasonable
• “[T]here is no reason for reversal even though isolated clauses may, in fact, be confusing, technically imperfect, or otherwise subject to criticism.” (quotations omitted)
• de- fendant’s life sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to dis- tribute cocaine base was reasonable
• “We will not reverse a defendant’s conviction based on a challenge to the jury charge unless we are left with a substantial and ineradicable doubt as to whether the jury was properly guided in its deliberations.”
• internal quo- tation mark omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).