· 2/26/1963
Peterson v. City of Norwalk
Citations
- 150 Conn. 366
- 190 A.2d 33
- 1963 Conn. LEXIS 209
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff entitled to declaration of validity of city’s contract to maintain bridge, even though city not called on yet to expend funds for such maintenance; “contractual obligation to do so in the future is there now, even if some unforeseen event may alter or eliminate it”
- plaintiff entitled to declaration of validity of city’s contract to maintain bridge, even though city had not yet been called on to expend funds for such maintenance; ‘‘contractual obligation to do so in the future is there now, even if some unforeseen event may alter or eliminate it’’
- 2 Conn. L. Rptr. 830, 832
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldwin, King, Mukpht, Shea, Alcorn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.