Skip to main content
· 2/26/1963

Peterson v. City of Norwalk

Citations

  • 150 Conn. 366
  • 190 A.2d 33
  • 1963 Conn. LEXIS 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff entitled to declaration of validity of city’s contract to maintain bridge, even though city not called on yet to expend funds for such maintenance; “contractual obligation to do so in the future is there now, even if some unforeseen event may alter or eliminate it”
  • plaintiff entitled to declaration of validity of city’s contract to maintain bridge, even though city had not yet been called on to expend funds for such maintenance; ‘‘contractual obligation to do so in the future is there now, even if some unforeseen event may alter or eliminate it’’
  • 2 Conn. L. Rptr. 830, 832

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldwin, King, Mukpht, Shea, Alcorn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.