Skip to main content
· 8/11/1997

Peterson Outdoor Advertising v. City of Myrtle Beach

Citations

  • 489 S.E.2d 630
  • 327 S.C. 230
  • 1997 S.C. LEXIS 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Board's denial of proposal must be based on application of the City Code to the facts of the case
  • Board’s denial of proposal must be based on application of the City Code to the facts of the case
  • in the context of zoning, a decision of a reviewing body will not be disturbed if there is evidence in the record to support its decision
  • a strong presumption exists in favor of the validity and application of zoning ordinances
  • a strong presumption exists in favor of the validity and application of zoning ordinances
  • “[T]he decision of the zoning board will not be upheld where it is based on errors of law, ... or where there is no legal evidence to support it, or where the board acts arbitrarily or unreasonably, ... or where, in general, the board has abused its discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Finney, Moore, Toal, Ervin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.