Skip to main content
· 11/3/1995

Petersen v. Utah Board of Pardons

Citations

  • 907 P.2d 1148
  • 277 Utah Adv. Rep. 8
  • 1995 Utah LEXIS 70
  • 1995 WL 647704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when a “[c]ourt’s writ powers are derived from the constitution, the Legislature cannot diminish them”
  • \[S]ubject matter jurisdiction is an issue that can and should be addressed sua sponte when jurisdiction is questionable.\
  • “The extraordinary writs do not, however, authorize [appellate courts] to exercise the same scope of review as may be exercised pursuant to statutory appeals.”
  • “The extraordinary writs do not, however, authorize [appellate courts] to exercise the same scope of review as may be exercised pursuant to statutory appeals.”
  • “[S]ubject matter jurisdiction is an issue that can and should be addressed sua sponte when jurisdiction is questionable.”
  • “Because this Court’s writ powers are derived from the constitution, the Legislature cannot diminish them. As early as 1908, it was established that the Legislature had no power to restrict the writ powers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zimmerman, Howe, Durham, Russon, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.