· 1/17/2001
Petersen v. Crook County
Citations
- 17 P.3d 563
- 172 Or. App. 44
- 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 7
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where the accuracy of the contents of documents contained in court file was subject to reasonable dispute, those contents could not properly be judicially noticed
- where accuracy of the contents of documents contained in court file was subject to reasonable dispute, those contents could not properly be judicially noticed
- to establish a public easement, claimants must prove by clear and convincing evidence the additional element of use by the general public
- where accuracy of the contents of documents contained in trial court file was subject to reasonable dispute, those contents could not properly be judicially noticed
- where accuracy of the contents of documents contained in trial court file was subject to reasonable dispute, those contents could not properly be judicially noticed
- adverse use must be for requisite prescriptive period
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Linder, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.