Skip to main content
· 1/17/2001

Petersen v. Crook County

Citations

  • 17 P.3d 563
  • 172 Or. App. 44
  • 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the accuracy of the contents of documents contained in court file was subject to reasonable dispute, those contents could not properly be judicially noticed
  • where accuracy of the contents of documents contained in court file was subject to reasonable dispute, those contents could not properly be judicially noticed
  • to establish a public easement, claimants must prove by clear and convincing evidence the additional element of use by the general public
  • where accuracy of the contents of documents contained in trial court file was subject to reasonable dispute, those contents could not properly be judicially noticed
  • where accuracy of the contents of documents contained in trial court file was subject to reasonable dispute, those contents could not properly be judicially noticed
  • adverse use must be for requisite prescriptive period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Linder, Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.