Skip to main content
· 12/28/1998

Petersen v. CHICAGO PLAN COM'N

Citations

  • 707 N.E.2d 150
  • 302 Ill. App. 3d 461
  • 236 Ill. Dec. 305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a procedural due process claim based on the expan- sion of the Museum of Science and Industry on the ground that the plaintiffs had no protectible property interest in Jack- son Park
  • rejecting a procedural due process claim based on the expan- sion of the Museum of Science and Industry on the ground that the plaintiffs had no protectible property interest in Jack- son Park
  • all aspects of due process protection need not be afforded at a fact-gathering hearing conducted before a plan commission
  • all aspects of due process protection need not be afforded at a fact-gathering hearing conducted before a plan commission
  • “The essence of due process is the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.”
  • due process in administrative proceeding does not require a judicial proceeding; it is satisfied by a procedure proper to the nature of the determination to be made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.