· 10/25/2013
Peters v. Woodbury County
Citations
- 979 F. Supp. 2d 901
- 2013 WL 5775027
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153449
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[C]ourts narrowly construe the work product doctrine consistent with its purpose of protecting the attorneys’ work in representing a client.”
- “the Court considers persuasive, in this analysis, the time when the document is created.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.