Skip to main content
· 10/25/2013

Peters v. Woodbury County

Citations

  • 979 F. Supp. 2d 901
  • 2013 WL 5775027
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]ourts narrowly construe the work product doctrine consistent with its purpose of protecting the attorneys’ work in representing a client.”
  • “the Court considers persuasive, in this analysis, the time when the document is created.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.